One thing that Microsoft founder Bill Gates can blame is lazy. He had already programmed at the age of 14, founded Microsoft at age 20, while still a student at Harvard. By 1995, he was renamed Forbes as the richest man in the world, who became the largest shareholder in his company, Microsoft, a company that his tireless disk built into an actual monopoly in software systems for personal computers.
In 2006, when most people in such a situation might think about reaching a quiet island in the Pacific Ocean, Bill Gates decided to devote his energy to his fund Bill and Melinda Gates, the largest transparent private fund in the world, which, he said, has enormous funds In the amount of 34.6 billion dollars. USA And the legal need to spend 1.5 billion dollars. USA per year for charitable projects around the world to maintain its free charitable status. A gift from a friend and business partner, mega investor Warren Buffett in 2006, from about $ 30 billion. The stock of Buffets Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates Foundation in the league, where he spends almost the entire annual budget of the United Nations Health Organization.
Therefore, when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest about $ 30 million of his earned money in the project, it’s worth seeing.
At the moment the project is more interesting than a curious project in one of the most remote corners of the world – Svalbard. Bill Gates invests millions in a seed bank in the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, about 1100 kilometers from the North Pole. Spitsbergen is a barren rock, declared by Norway and ceded in 1925 by an international treaty (see Map).
On this deserted island, Bill Gates invests tens of millions of his millions with the Rockefeller Foundation, the Monsanto Corporation, the Syngenta Foundation and the Norwegian government, including the so-called seed bank of a madman. Officially, the project is named Svalbard Global Seed Storage on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the island group of Svalbard.
The seed bank is built in the mountains on the island of Spitsbergen near the small village of Longyearbyen. Its almost ready for business according to their releases. The bank will have double explosion-proof doors with motion sensors, two air locks and reinforced concrete walls with a thickness of 1 meter. According to the Norwegian government, it will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from around the world, so that cultural diversity can be preserved for the future. The seeds will be specially wrapped to prevent moisture. A full-time staff will not exist, but relative inaccessibility of storage facilities will facilitate monitoring of any possible human activity.
Did we miss something? Their press release says that the diversity of cultures can persist in the future. What future do the seed bank sponsors predict, which would jeopardize the global availability of existing seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?
At any time, Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto and Syngenta gather together for a common project, its value further deepens behind the rocks on Spitsbergen. When we do, we find some exciting things.
The first important point is who is the sponsor of the seed storage at the end of the world. Here, joining the Norwegians, as noted, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; American agribusiness giant DuPont / Pioneer Hi-Bred, one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically modified (GMO) plant seeds and related agrochemicals; Syngenta, a Swiss major company for the production of seeds and agrochemicals in GMOs through its Syngenta fund; The Rockefeller Foundation, a private group that created a revolution in the gene with more than $ 100 million in initial money since the 1970s; CGIAR, a global network created by the Rockefeller Foundation to promote its ideal of genetic purity by changing agriculture.
The CGIAR and the project
As I mentioned in the book Seeds of Destruction, in 1960 the Rockefeller Foundation, the John F. Rockefeller III Agricultural Development Council and the Ford Foundation joined forces to create the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in Los Baños in the Philippines. By 1971, the Rockefeller Foundation IRRI, together with its International Center for the Improvement of Corn and Wheat in Mexico and two other international research centers established in Rockefeller and Ford, in the ITAC for tropical agriculture, Nigeria and IRRI for rice, the Philippines, combined with Form A global advisory group on international agricultural research (CGIAR).
CGIAR was formed on a series of private conferences held at the Rockefeller Foundations conference center in Bellagio, Italy. The main participants in the Bellagio talks were the Rockefeller Foundation George Harrard, Ford Forrest Hill Hill, Robert McNamara of the World Bank and Maurice Strong, the international environmental organizer of the Rockefeller family, who, as the Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation, organized the UN Earth Summit in Stockholm in 1972. It was Part of the foundations that for decades have been concentrating to turn science into a service of eugenics, a disgusting version of racial purity that was called the Project.
To ensure maximum impact, the CGIAR appealed to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the United Nations Development Program and the World Bank. Thus, thanks to the carefully planned lever of its original funds, the Rockefeller Foundation by the early 1970s was able to form a global agricultural policy. And to form this.
Funded by the generous research grants of Rockefeller and Ford, CGIAR has been making sure that leading scientists and agronomists from third world countries are brought to the US to master the concepts of modern agribusiness production in order to return it to their homeland. In the course of this process, they created an invaluable network of influence on the promotion of agribusiness in these countries, in particular the promotion of the GMO Gene Revolution in developing countries, in the name of science and an efficient, free agricultural market.
Genetically develop master-races?
Now the Svalbard Seed Bank is beginning to become interesting. But everything is getting better. The project I was talking about is a project of the Rockefeller Foundation and powerful financial interests since the 1920s to use eugenics, later renamed genetics, to justify the creation of the genetically engineered Master Race. Hitler and the Nazis called him the Ayran main race.
Eugenic of Hitler was financed largely by the same Rockefeller Foundation, which today is building a storehouse for the twilight seed to preserve samples of each seed on our planet. Now it becomes really intriguing. The Rockefeller Foundation created a pseudoscientific discipline in molecular biology in their relentless pursuit of the reduction of human life up to the defining sequence of genes that they hoped could then be changed to change human features if desired. Scientists, Hitler’s eugenics, many of whom were quietly brought to the United States after the war to continue research on biological eugenics, laid most of the basis for genetic engineering of various life forms, most of which were openly supported, right up to the Third Reich by Rockefeller. Generous grants.
The same Rockefeller Foundation created the so-called “Green Revolution” from a trip to Mexico in 1946 by Nelson Rockefeller and former secretary of agriculture New Deal and founder of Pioneer Hi-Bred Seed Henry Wallace.
The “Green Revolution” decided to solve the problem of hunger in the world to a large extent in Mexico, India and other countries where Rockefeller worked. The Rockefeller agro, Norman Borlaug, received the Nobel Peace Prize for his work, hardly something to boast of such as Henry Kissinger.
In fact, a few years later, the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme for the development of a globalized agribusiness, which they could then monopolize, as it was in the world oil industry half a century ago. As Henry Kissinger said in the 1970s, if you control oil, you control the country; If you control food, you control the population.
Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went hand in hand. They were part of a great strategy that in a few years included funding for Rockefeller Foundation research for the development of plant and animal genetic engineering.
John H. Davies was an assistant to the Minister of Agriculture under President Dwight D. Eisenhower in the early 1950s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an agricultural specialist in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956, Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review, in which he stated that the only way to solve the problem of the so-called farm once and for all and avoid cumbersome government programs is to move from agriculture to agribusiness. He knew exactly what he meant, although only a few knew about the revolution in agriculture that would concentrate control over the food chain in corporate multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer.
A key aspect of the interest of the Rockefeller Foundation and the American companies of the AIC was that the Green Revolution was based on the spread of new hybrid seeds in emerging markets. One of the vital aspects of hybrid seeds was the lack of reproductive ability. Hybrids had built-in protection against reproduction. In contrast to the usual open pollinated species, the seeds of which yielded crops similar to those of their parents, the yield of seeds obtained by hybrid plants was significantly lower than that of the first generation.
This decline in yields, characteristic of hybrids, means that farmers usually buy seeds every year to get high yields. Moreover, the lower yield of the second generation excluded the trade in seeds, which was often done by seed producers without the permission of breeders. This prevented the redistribution of commercial seed by intermediaries. If large multinational seed companies are able to control the parent sowing lines in the house, no competitor or farmer will be able to produce a hybrid. The global concentration of hybrid seed patents in a handful of giant seed companies led by DuPonts Pioneer Hi-Bred and Monsantos Dekalb laid the foundation for a later GMO seed revolution
In fact, the introduction of modern American agricultural technologies, chemical fertilizers and commercial hybrid seeds has led local farmers in developing countries, especially the larger ones, to become dependent on foreign, mostly American agribusinesses and petrochemical companies. This was the first step towards what should have been a long, carefully planned process.
As part of the Green Revolution, agribusiness has made major strides in markets that previously had limited access to US exporters. This trend was later called the agricultural market. In fact, it was agriculture, controlled by agribusiness.
Through the Green Revolution, the Rockefeller Foundation and later the Ford Foundation worked hand in hand and supported the foreign policy goals of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the CIA.
One of the main consequences of the “green revolution” was to destroy the rural areas of the peasants, who were forced to flee to the slums of slums in cities in desperate search for work. It was not accidental; This was part of the plan to create cheap labor pools for the upcoming multinational productions of the United States, the globalization of recent years.
When self-promotion around the “green revolution” subsided, the results were not at all what they had promised. Problems arose as a result of the indiscriminate use of new chemical pesticides, often with serious health consequences. Monocultural cultivation of new hybrid varieties of seeds reduces soil fertility and yields over time. The first results were impressive: a double or even triple crop for some crops, such as wheat and later corn in Mexico. It soon disappeared.
The Green Revolution, as a rule, was accompanied by large irrigation projects, which often included World Bank loans for the construction of huge new dams and the flooding of previously settled areas and fertile farmland in the process. In addition, super wheat provided higher yields, saturating the soil with a huge amount of fertilizer per acre, fertilizer was a product of nitrates and oil, the goods were controlled by the major oil companies Seven Sisters, owned by Rockefeller.
Also used a huge number of herbicides and pesticides, creating additional markets for oil and chemical giants. According to one analyst, the “Green Revolution” was just a chemical revolution. In no case did developing countries pay for a huge amount of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. They will receive the World Bank’s credit courtesy and special loans from Chase Bank and other major New York banks, backed by US government guarantees.
Applied in a large number of developing countries, these loans mainly came to large landowners. For small farmers, the situation has changed in different ways. Small peasant farmers could not afford chemical and other modern materials and they had to borrow money.
Initially, various government programs tried to provide loans to farmers so that they could buy seeds and fertilizers. Farmers who could not participate in such a program had to borrow from the private sector. Due to excessive interest rates on unofficial loans, many small farmers did not even benefit from the initial higher yield. After harvesting, they had to sell the majority, if not all of their products, to repay loans and interest. They became dependent on lenders and traders and often lost their land. Even with concessional loans from state bodies, the increase in the yield of agricultural crops gave way to the production of cash crops.
Initially, various government programs tried to provide loans to farmers so that they could buy seeds and fertilizers. Farmers who could not participate in such a program had to borrow from the private sector. Because of the exorbitant interest rates on unofficial loans, many small farmers did not even benefit from the initial higher yield. After harvesting, they had to sell the majority, if not all of their products, to repay loans and interest. They became dependent on lenders and traders and often lost their land. Even with concessional loans from state bodies, the increase in the yield of agricultural crops gave way to the production of cash crops.
Gates, Rockefeller and the Green Revolution in Africa
With the true background of the 50s Rockefeller Foundation Green Revolution it is clear that it is especially interesting that the same Rockefeller Foundation, together with the Gates Foundation, who are currently investing millions of dollars in preserving each seed against a possible end-of-the-world scenario, are also investing millions in the Project under The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa.
AGRA, as he calls himself, is again an alliance with the same Rockefeller Foundation that created the Gene Revolution. This is evidenced by the opinion of the AGRA Board of Directors.
It consists of none other than former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan as chairman. In a speech at the World Economic Forum in Cape Town, South Africa in June 2007, Kofi Annan stated that I gratefully accepted this challenge with the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and all the others that support our African campaign.
In addition, the AGRA Board has a South African, Strive Masiyiwa, who is the Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation. This includes Sylvia M. Matthews of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Mamfela Rampele, former Managing Director of the World Bank (2000); Rajiv J. Shah of the Gates Foundation; Nadia K. Shmavonyan from the Rockefeller Foundation; Roy Steiner of the Gates Foundation. In addition, the Alliance for AGRA includes Gary Tönnissen, Managing Director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Akinvumi Adesinu, Deputy Director of the Rockefeller Foundation.
To complete the list, the programs for AGRA include Peter Matlon, managing director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Joseph De Vries, Director of the Program for Seed Systems of Africa and Deputy Director of the Rockefeller Foundation; Akinvumi Adesina, deputy director of the Rockefeller Foundation. Like the old unsuccessful Green Revolution in India and Mexico, the new Green Revolution in Africa is certainly one of the priorities of the Rockefeller Foundation.
Despite the fact that today they remain in the shadow, Monsanto and large agro business giants GMOs are considered to be the basis for using Kofi Annans AGRA to distribute their patented GMO seeds in Africa under a deceptive label, biotechnology, a new euphemism for genetic engineering. Patented seeds. To date, South Africa is the only African country that permits the legal cultivation of GMOs. In 2003, Burkina Faso authorized the testing of GMOs. In 2005, Kofi Annas Ghana drafted legislation on biosafety, and key officials expressed their intention to continue research on GMOs.
Africa is the next target of the US government’s campaign to spread GMOs around the world. Its rich soils make it an ideal candidate. Not surprisingly, many African governments suspected the worst of the sponsors of GMOs, as in Africa, many genetic engineering and biosafety projects were initiated to introduce GMOs into African agricultural systems. These include sponsorships offered by the US government for training African genetic engineering scientists in the US, biosafety projects funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the World Bank; A GMO study involving African local food crops.
The Rockefeller Foundation has been working for many years to promote, mostly without success, projects for the introduction of GMOs in the field of Africa. They supported studies that support the applicability of GMO cotton in Mahatini apartments in South Africa.
Monsanto, which has a solid foundation in the South African seed industry, both GMOs and hybrids, has developed the inventive program of small farmers, known as the “Seeds of Hope” campaign, which presents a package of the “green revolution” to small poor farmers, after which, of course , The patented Monsantos GMO seeds.
Syngenta AG from Switzerland, one of the four riders of the GMO Apocalypse, is pouring millions of dollars into a new greenhouse plant in Nairobi to develop maize that is resistant to insect-GMO. Syngenta is also part of CGIAR.
Moving to Svalbard
Now it’s just philosophical slovenliness? What makes the Gates and Rockefeller funds at the same time support the distribution of patented Terminator patented terminators in Africa, a process that, like in all other places on Earth, destroys plant varieties. How does the monoculture of industrial agribusiness develop? At the same time, they are investing tens of millions of dollars to preserve all the varieties of seeds known in the explosion-proof vaulted report under the remote Arctic Circle, in order to diversify the crop can be saved in the future to confirm its official release?
It is no coincidence that the Rockefeller and Gates foundations combine to promote the Green Revolution in the style of GMOs in Africa, while at the same time they quietly fund the Day of Judgment on Svalbard. GMO agribusiness giants reach their ears in the Svalbard project.
Indeed, the entire enterprise in Svalbard and the people involved in it call the worst catastrophic images of Michael Crichton’s best-selling book – Andromeda Strain, a sci-fi thriller where a deadly disease of extraterrestrial origin causes the rapid, deadly clotting of blood that threatens the entire human family. On Svalbard, the future safe storage of seeds In the world will be guarded by the GMO Green Revolution police, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Gates Foundation, Syngenta, DuPont and CGIAR.
The Svalbard project will be managed by an organization called the Global Cultural Diversity Trust (GCDT). Who are they to hold such great confidence over the planets of all varieties of seeds? GCDT was established by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Bioversity International (formerly the International Plant Genetic Research Institute), a branch of the CGIAR.
The Global Trust for Cultural Diversity is based in Rome. His board is headed by Margaret Katley-Carlson, Canadian, also on the advisory board of the Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux, one of the world’s largest private water companies. Ktli-Carlson also served as president until 1998 of the New York Population Council, the John D. Rockefeller Population Reduction Organization, established in 1952 to advance the Rockefeller Family Feminization Program under the guise of promoting family planning, birth control devices, sterilization and Population Control In developing countries.
Other GCDT board members include former CEO of Bank of America, who currently heads Hollywood DreamWorks Animation, Lewis Coleman. Coleman is also the lead director of the board of directors of Northrup Grumman Corporation, one of the largest US military contractors in the Pentagon.
Jorio Dauster (Brazil) is also the chairman of the board of Brasil Ecodiesel. He is the former Brazilian ambassador to the European Union and the chief negotiator for Brazil’s external debt to the Ministry of Finance. Dowster was also president of the Brazilian coffee institute and as coordinator of a project to modernize the Brazils patent system, which includes the legalization of patents for seeds that have been genetically modified, which until recently was prohibited by the laws of Brazil.
Carey Fowler is the executive director of the Trust. Fowler was a professor and director of research at the Department of International Studies in the Field of Environment and Development of the Norwegian University of Natural Sciences. He was also a senior advisor to the general director of Bioversity International. There he represented the future harvest centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) during the negotiations on the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources. In the 1990s, he led the International Program on Plant Genetic Resources in FAO. He developed and monitored the negotiations on the FAO Global Plan of Action on Plant Genetic Resources, adopted by 150 countries in 1996. He is a past member of the US National Plant Genetic Resources Council and the Board of Trustees of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center in Mexico, another Rockefeller Foundation and the CGIAR project.
Member of the GCDT Board Dr Mangala Rai of India is Secretary of the Department of Agricultural Research and Education of India (DARE) and Director General of the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR). He is also a member of the Board of the International Rockefeller Research Institute (IRRI), which promotes the first major GMO experiment in the world, a heavily inflated golden rice, which proved unsuccessful. He was a member of the Board of Directors of CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) and a member of the CGIAR Executive Board.
Global Crop Diversity Trust Fund Donors or financial angels also include, according to the classic Humphrey Bogart Casablanca, all the usual suspects. In addition to the Rockefeller Foundation and Gates, donors include GMO DuPont-Pioneer Hi-Bred, Syngenta from Basel Switzerland, CGIAR and government departments that are actively involved with the USAID-assisted development agency. Indeed, it seems that we have GMOs and foxes to reduce populations that protect the human coop, the world store of seed diversity in Svalbard.
Why now Spitsbergen?
We can legitimately ask why Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation, along with major agribusiness giants such as DuPont and Syngenta, together with CGIAR are building the Doomsday repository in the Arctic.
Who uses such a seed bank in the first place? Plant breeders and plant researchers are the main users of gene banks. Today’s largest plant breeders are Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta and Dow Chemical, GMO global giants, patenting plants. Since the beginning of 2007, Monsanto owns global patent rights with the United States government for the production of the so-called Terminator or Genetic Restriction Technology (GURT). Terminator is an ominous technology by which a patented commercial seed commits suicide after one harvest. Control by private seed companies is common. Such control and power over the food chain has never before existed in the history of mankind.
This clever, genetically modified terminator force forces farmers to return to Monsanto or other GMO seed suppliers each year to obtain new seeds for rice, soybeans, corn, wheat, any major crops needed to feed their population. If he was widely represented all over the world, he could, within about a decade or so, make the majority of food producers new serfs in slavery with three or four giant seed companies, such as Monsanto or DuPont or Dow Chemical.
This, of course, can also open the door to these private companies, perhaps, on the orders of the host government, Washington, to deny the seeds of a developing country whose policies have gone against Washington. Those who say that this can not happen here should be more attentive to the current global events. The mere existence of this concentration of power in three or four private American agribusiness giants is the basis for a legal ban on all GMO crops, even if their harvest income was real, which they are clearly not.
These private companies, Monsanto, DuPont, Dow Chemical are unlikely to have a clean record in terms of managing human life. They developed and distributed innovations such as dioxin, PCB, Orange agent. They hid for decades clear evidence of carcinogenic and other serious consequences for human health from the use of toxic chemicals. They buried serious scientific reports that the most common herbicide, glyphosate, the main ingredient of the Monsantos Roundup herbicide, associated with the acquisition of most seeds synthesized by genetically modified Monsanto seeds, is toxic when it seeps into drinking water.
Denmark banned glyphosate in 2003, when it confirmed that it had contaminated the country’s groundwater.
The diversity stored in the banks of seed genes is a raw material for plant breeding and a significant amount of basic biological research. For these purposes, several hundred thousand samples are spent every year. The UN FAO has about 1,400 seed banks around the world, the largest of which is owned by the United States government. Other major banks are China, Russia, Japan, India, South Korea, Germany and Canada in descending order of size. In addition, CGIAR manages a chain of seed banks in selected centers around the world.
CGIAR, created in 1972 by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation to distribute its agribusiness model “Green Revolution”, controls most private seed banks from the Philippines to Syria to Kenya. All these current seed banks contain more than six and a half million varieties of seeds, of which almost two million. Svalbards Doomsday Vault will be able to accommodate four and a half million different seeds.
GMOs as a weapon of biological protection?
Now we come to the very heart of the danger and potential danger of misuse inherent in the Svalbard Bill Gates project and the Rockefeller Foundation. Can the development of patented seeds for most of the world’s major food crops, such as rice, corn, wheat and fodder grains such as soybeans, ultimately be used in a terrible form of biological warfare?
The clear purpose of the eugenic lobby, financed by wealthy elitist families such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, embodied what they called negative eugenics, the systematic destruction of unwanted genealogies. Margaret Sanger, the fast eugenist, the founder of the international organization Planned Parenthood and a close relative of the Rockefeller family, created the Negro Project project in 1939, based in Harlem, which, as she passed on a letter to a friend, was related to the fact that, as she put it , We want to destroy the Negro population.
A small California biotechnology company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of a genetically modified corn containing a spermicide that made sperm of people who ate it sterile. At that time, Epicyte had a joint agreement on the distribution of its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was purchased by North Carolina biotech. It’s amazing to know that Epicyte developed spermicide GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same US Department of Agriculture, which, despite world opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, which is currently being carried out by Monsanto.
In the 1990s, the World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, presumably against Tentan, a disease that arises from things like stupor on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men and boys, despite the fact that they are probably equally capable of stepping on rusty nails, like women.
Because of this curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, the Catholic Leninist organization became suspicious and checked the vaccine samples. Tests have shown that the tetanus vaccine distributed by WHO only to women of childbearing age contains human chorionic gonadotropin or hCG, a natural hormone that, in combination with a tetanus toxoid stimulant, stimulates antibodies, making a woman unable to support pregnancy. None of the vaccinated women was told.
It later emerged that the Rockefeller Foundation, together with the Rockefeller Population Council, the World Bank (CGIAR House) and the United States National Institutes of Health, participated in a 20-year project, begun in 1972, to develop a concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Norwegian government, which accepts the Seibard Seed Safe, donated $ 41 million to develop a special abortive tetanus vaccine.
Is it coincidence that these same organizations from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also participating in the Svalbard seed bank project? According to Professor Francis Boyle, who developed the Law on the Suppression of Terrorism in Biological Weapons of 1989, adopted by the US Congress, the Pentagon is now preparing to fight and win a biological war in the framework of two directives of the Bush national strategy, he notes, without public knowledge and review in 2002. Boyle adds that only in 2001-2004 the US federal government spent 14.5 billion dollars. USA for civil activities related to biological war, a staggering amount.
Rutgers University biologist Richard Abright believes that more than 300 scientific institutions and about 12,000 people in the US today have access to pathogens suitable for biomarkets. Alone, there are 497 grants of the US government NIH for the study of infectious diseases with the potential of biopolarity. Of course, this is justified under the protection of a possible terrorist attack, as it is today.
Many of the US dollars spent on research in the field of biological research are related to genetic engineering. Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jonathan King says that the growing bioterror programs represent a significant emerging danger for our own population. The king adds, while such programs are always called defensive, and biological weapons, defensive and offensive programs almost completely overlap.
Time will tell, God Forbid, Svalbard Bank of the Judgment Day Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation are part of yet another Final Solution, which is associated with the disappearance of the Great Planet Earth.
1 F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction, Montreal, (Global Research, 2007).
2 Ibid., P.72-90.
3 John H. Davies, Harvard Business Review, 1956, cited in Jeffrey Lawrence, Agrobusiness, Capitalism and the Countryside, Pluto Press, Sydney, 1987. See also Harvard Business School, “Evolution of Industry and Seminar”: Workshop on Agribusiness, http: //www.exed.hbs.edu/programs/agb/seminar.html.
4 Engdahl, op cit., P. 130.
5 Ibid. P. 123-30.
6 Miriam Mayet, “The New Green Revolution in Africa: A Trojan Horse for GMOs,” May 2007, African Center for Biosafety, http://www.biosafetyafrica.net.
7 ETC Group, Green Revolution 2.0 for Africa, Issue No. 94, March / April 2007.
8 The Global Website of the Task Force on Diversity of Crops: http://www.croptrust.org/main/donors.php.
9 Engdahl, op. Cit., Pp.227-236.
10 Anders Legart Smith, Denmark Prohibitions Glyphosate, active ingredient in Roundup, Politiken, September 15, 2003, at organic.com.au/news/2003.09.15.
11 Tanya L. Green, Project “Negro”: The Genocide Project by Margaret Sains for black Americans, inwww.blackgenocide.org/negro.html.
12 Engdahl, op. Cit., Pp. 273-275; Miller’s Military Prosecutor, new contraceptive vaccines?, HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June / July 1995, volume 13, number 8.
13 Sherwood Ross, Bush is developing illegal bioterror weapons for offensive use, on December 20, 2006, at http://www.truthout.org (through minds.com).